Bitwarden vs. Keeper

Centralized ownership for control and oversight
Shared items are owned and controlled by the organization, not the employees.

Built for Least Privilege Access
Granular permissions, RBAC, and a sharing model that doesn't use duplicates or shortcuts align with the principle of least privilege.

Security you can trust and verify
Open source and independently audited.

Faster detection, smarter response
Access Intelligence delivers proactive insights into threats for quicker resolution, for shared and unshared items.

Loved by employees, trusted by IT
Bitwarden earns top satisfaction scores for ease of use, driving adoption and reducing IT support tickets.

Start a free trial >

Decentralized and difficult to manage
Users own the items and create a tangled web of sharing, meaning headaches when they leave the company or delete an item.

Out-of-date architecture
Keeper’s model lacks strict adherence to Least Privilege principles, leaving organizations exposed and failing to meet modern compliance requirements.

Security you can’t verify
Closed-source design leaves IT teams in the dark.

Slower, siloed response
Essential features like breach reporting are sold separately, draining time and resources.

Frustrating for employees, draining for IT
Keeper ranks lower in ease-of-use satisfaction, slowing adoption and creating more support burden for IT teams.